From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mcken...@linaro.org>
If CPUs are to give prior notice of needed grace periods, it will be
necessary to invoke rcu_start_gp() without dropping the root rcu_node
structure's ->lock. This commit takes a first step in this direction
by moving the release of this lock to the end of rcu_start_gp().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mcken...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 4b8d91c..7207435 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1559,16 +1559,14 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
-
rsp->gp_flags = RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT;
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* Interrupts remain disabled. */
/* Ensure that CPU is aware of completion of last grace period. */
- rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ __rcu_process_gp_end(rsp, rdp->mynode, rdp);
/* Wake up rcu_gp_kthread() to start the grace period. */
wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
/*
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
