Hi Stephen,

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> @@ -234,11 +243,11 @@
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
>  
> -     spin_lock(&info->lock);
> -     shmem_recalc_inode(page->mapping->host);
>       entry = shmem_swp_entry(info, page->index); 
>       if (IS_ERR(entry)) /* this had been allocted on page allocation */
>               BUG();
> +     spin_lock(&info->lock);
> +     shmem_recalc_inode(page->mapping->host);
>       error = -EAGAIN;
>       if (entry->val) {
>               __swap_free(swap, 2);

I think this is wrong. The spinlock protects us against
shmem_truncate. shmem_swp_entry cannot sleep in this case since the
entry is allocated in nopage.

Greetings
                Christoph


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to