Hello, Rusty. On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:17:11AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > So, I guess this currently is caught in a place which isn't here or > > there. I'm pretty skeptical whether it makes sense to bother about > > static usages tho. Can I keep them for static ones? > > I didn't realize that cpuset_attach was a fastpath. If it is, put a
It isn't a hot path. It's just a bit nasty to have to allocate them separately. > static there and I'll fix turn it into a bitmap when I need to. > Otherwise, please don't change the code in the first place. So, the plan to drop cpumask_t is still on? If so, I'll leave cpumask_var_t. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
