3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
commit 11ee7e99f35ecb15f59b21da6a82d96d2cd3fcc8 upstream.
If we build a kernel with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=n,
the kernel fails when we run at a non zero offset. It turns out
we were incorrectly wrapping some of the relocatable kernel code
with CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
index 694e3fa..11a4df9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ _STATIC(__after_prom_start)
tovirt(r6,r6) /* on booke, we already run at
PAGE_OFFSET */
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
+#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
/*
* Check if the kernel has to be running as relocatable kernel based on the
* variable __run_at_load, if it is set the kernel is treated as relocatable
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
