On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, David Konerding wrote: > No, the point is that the linux developers should regression test > their code BEFORE releasing it to the public as a version like > "2.4.2". I take it you're volunteering ? Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- "mount -o loop" lockup issue David E. Weekly
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Jason Madden
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue David Konerding
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Alan Cox
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup is... David Konerding
- Re: "mount -o loop" lock... Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: "mount -o loop" ... J Sloan
- Re: "mount -o loop&qu... Alexander Viro
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Rik van Riel
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup is... David Konerding
- Kernel QA Rik van Riel
- Kernel QA James Lewis Nance
- Re: Kernel QA Shawn Starr
- Re: Kernel QA Alexander Valys
- Re: "mount -o loop" lock... Alan Cox
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue William Stearns
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Joerg Pommnitz
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue David Konerding
- Re: "mount -o loop" lockup issue Joerg Pommnitz