On Friday 21 December 2012 12:50 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> Commit d6b2123802d "make sure that we always have a return path from >> kernel_execve()" reshuffled kernel_init()/init_post() to ensure that >> kernel_execve() has a caller to return to. >> >> It removed __init annotation for kernel_init() and introduced/calls a >> new routine kernel_init_freeable(). Latter however is inlined by any >> reasonable compiler (ARC gcc 4.4 in this case), causing slight code >> bloat. > Interesting... I assumed that explicitly set different section would be > enough, but I'd been wrong (or the original noinline would've been pointless, > now that I think of it). Consider it ACKed; I can pick it through signal.git, > and while it's not urgent I'd send it to Linus after -rc1, with Cc: stable. > Or you can send it to him yourself with my usual Acked-by - up to you.
Merging via your signal.git is fine. Thx, -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
