On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Well, bummer. I can't seem to find Eric's message archived anywhere. > > FWIW I am opposed to any large-scale cleanup of the configuration > language and/or identifiers in -any- 2.4.x series kernel. Seconded, this is a 2.5 issue... (IMHO, at least) Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Peter Samuelson
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Keith Owens
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup ... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Rik van Riel
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch John Cowan
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Rik van Riel
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Kai Henningsen