On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well, bummer. I can't seem to find Eric's message archived anywhere.
>
> FWIW I am opposed to any large-scale cleanup of the configuration
> language and/or identifiers in -any- 2.4.x series kernel.
Seconded, this is a 2.5 issue... (IMHO, at least)
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Peter Samuelson
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Keith Owens
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Jeff Garzik
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup ... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Rik van Riel
- Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch John Cowan
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Rik van Riel
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML1 cleanup patch Kai Henningsen

