On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:26:22PM +0000, James A. Sutherland wrote: > If SuSE's install program needs more than a quarter Gb of RAM, you need a > better distro. Well, it's rpm ... I guess the Debian packager is more friendly. But if you choose to install a huge number of packages, the job to do for the package manager (dependencies ...) is no trivial to do with few resources. But that's not the point of the discussion. Kernel related questions IMHO are: (1) Why do we get into OOM? Can we avoid it? (2) Is OOM sometimes misdetected (or triggered too early) and why? (3) Does the OOM killer choose the right processes? Regards, -- Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG SCSI, Security
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Matthew Chappee
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Jasper Spaans
- Re: [PATCH] OOM handling Michael Peddemors
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from kil... Stephen Satchell
- [PATCH] non-overcommit memor... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] non-overcommit m... Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Guest section DW
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Doug Ledford
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Kurt Garloff
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing ... Sandy Harris
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing ... Guest section DW
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Patrick O'Rourke
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init James A. Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Szabolcs Szakacsits
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Rik van Riel
- RE: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Juha Saarinen
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Roger Gammans
- RE: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Leif Sawyer