Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote : > But if you start > to think you get the conclusion that process killing can't be avoided if > you want the system keep running. What's the point in keeping the OS running if the applications are silently killed? If your box is running for example a mail server, and it appears that another process is juste eating the free memory, do you really want to kill the mail server, just because it's the main process and consuming more memory and CPU than others? Well, fine, your OS is up, but your application is not here anymore. I just think there's no general solution, users must have the chance to choose processes not to be killed, or malloc() returning errors. ---- Benoît GARNIER - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing in... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Andreas Franck
- Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Ed Tomlinson
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Benoit Garnier
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Stephen Clouse
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Helge Hafting