On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck <w...@iguana.be> wrote: > Hi Davide > >> From: Alessandro Rubini <rub...@gnudd.com> >> >> The SP805 driver is only used by the Spear machines, and uses >> writel_relaxed, which is not available on all architectures. >> >> The dependency from CONFIG_ARM avoids compilation problems under >> randomconfig when CONFIG_ARM_AMBA is enabled for x86 builds. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rub...@gnudd.com> >> Acked-by: Giancarlo Asnaghi <giancarlo.asna...@st.com> >> Signed-off-by: Davide Ciminaghi <cimina...@gnudd.com> > > Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <w...@iguana.be>
Point of order. Adding Signed-off-by is only appropriate if you have actually "handled" a patch (ie. either applied it to your own git tree or you are reposting it). If you're merely stating that you're okay with the patch then "Acked-by" is what you should use. Signed-off-by is more properly about asserting that you received the patch under licensing terms compatible with the current. See Developer's Certificate of Origin in Documentation/SubmittingPatches for details. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
