Em Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:56:32PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:29:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Got inverted.
> > The order was arbitrary, and was arbitrarily reversed, are you guys sure > > this > > is the only side effect? > right, > currently (without namhyung's changes) there's initial 'name' sorting > broken by hists_link > after the change, it gets sorted 'but' there are dummy entries added > which brake the sort again.. this is sorted out within the multi diff > patches > so the bottom line is that currently the sorting is broken anyway, > and the fix is comming in upcomming patchset ;) Ok, applied to my perf/core branch and pushed out. > > Jiri, IIRC you mentioned that there would be some patch with an --order > > switch, > > would that allow sorting by the entry that had the biggest change, etc? > > by default it'll sorted by baseline and you can specify -o X to sort > by specified file great. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
