On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:28:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This really isn't a good solution, especially not for a system that's DT > > based - on a DT system we can tell if there should be a GPIO present so > > we should be able to defer only when there's something that might > > provide the GPIO later on. > Understood, but what's the solution for non-DT systems? Provide a fixed regulator or something, perhaps we need a "definitely does not exist" regulator to help with this. For every board you help with a sequencing bodge you're probably going to break another that needs different sequencing; for that matter it's not like GPIO controlled regulators are exclusively used for MMC, or that MMC exclusively uses GPIO - doing this for only one regulator is a bit of a red flag. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
