On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:55:52AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > The cond-statement of this particular for() loop will always be > true as long as at least one voltage-shifting GPIO is present. > If it wasn't for the break below, we'd be stuck in a forever loop. > This patch inserts the correct cond-statement into the statement.
Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
