On 2012-12-9 16:10, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Liu, Wu,
>
> On 12/06/2012 10:26 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2012-12-6 9:26, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2012 11:43 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>> If we make "movablecore_map" take precedence over "movablecore/kernelcore",
>>>> the logic could be simplified. I think it's not so attractive to support
>>>> both "movablecore_map" and "movablecore/kernelcore" at the same time.
>
> Thanks for the advice of removing movablecore/kernelcore. But since we
> didn't plan to do this in the beginning, and movablecore/kernelcore are
> more user friendly, I think for now, I'll handle DMA and low memory address
> problems as you mentioned, and just keep movablecore/kernelcore
> in the next version. :)
Hi Tang,
I mean we could ignore kernelcore/movablecore if user specifies
both movablecore_map and kernelcore/movablecore in the kernel command
line. I'm not suggesting to get rid of kernelcore/movablecore:)
Thanks!
>
> And about the SRAT, I think it is necessary to many users. I think we
> should provide both interfaces. I may give a try in the next version.
>
> Thanks. :)
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
