On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:59:24PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> >> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.23 release. >> >>> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> >>> let me know. >> >>> >> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Dec 9 00:50:03 UTC 2012. >> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >>> >> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> >>> >> >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.23-rc1.gz >> >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >>> >> >>> thanks, >> >>> >> >>> greg k-h >> >> >> >> Patche applied cleanly and compiled and booted on the following systems: >> >> >> >> HP EliteBook 6930p Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz >> >> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics >> >> >> >> Cross-compile tests >> >> alpha: defconfig passed >> >> arm: defconfig passed >> >> c6x: defconfig passed >> >> mips: defconfig passed >> >> mipsel: defconfig passed >> >> powerpc: wii_defconfig passed >> >> sh: defconfig passed >> >> sparc: defconfig passed >> >> tile: tilegx_defconfig passed >> > >> > Correction. >> > tile: tilegx_defconfig failed: >> > >> > tile tilegx_defconfig >> > >> > Just a snippet, I can send a full log. >> > >> > LD init/built-in.o >> > HOSTCC usr/gen_init_cpio >> > >> > /home/shuah/lkml/linux_stable_testing_3.0.56/scripts/gen_initramfs_list.sh: >> > Cannot open 'usr/contents.txt' >> > make[1]: *** [usr/initramfs_data.cpio] Error 1 >> > make: *** [usr] Error 2 >> > >> > Didn't get a chance to investigate. >> >> Sorry tile failure is for 3.0.56 > > Is that caused by something new in 3.0.56, or has it always been that > way?
Sorry forgot to mention that it is not a regression in 3.0.56. I compared the patch and this source file is not patched in 3.0.56-rc1. git log shows that this file was last touched back in Jan of 2011 and very likely this error was introduced in a commit from Sept 2010. You can choose to leave this in and I sent a patch which can go through its normal process and get pulled in when it gets approved by the powerpc maintainers. -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
