Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > [+] Speaking as a hacker on a runtime system for a concurrent > programming language (Erlang), I consider the current Unix/POSIX/Linux > default of having the kernel throw up[*] at the user's current stack > pointer to be unbelievably broken. sigaltstack() and SA_ONSTACK should > not be options but required behaviour. > Why? What problem does stack puke cause? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Mike Galbraith
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM fro... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from ki... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing... Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Mikael Pettersson
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Mikael Pettersson
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Mikael Pettersson
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Guest section DW
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Martin Dalecki
- RE: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Heusden, Folkert van
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init Jesse Pollard