The checked criterion is loop-independent and we hold the lock necessary
to do the check also outside the loop. So, move that piece of code more
towards the end where the result is used.
Signed-off-by: Jan H. Schönherr <schn...@cs.tu-berlin.de>
---
kernel/printk.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 7328348..4f3c355 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -2060,10 +2060,6 @@ again:
int level;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
- if (seen_seq != log_next_seq) {
- wake_klogd = true;
- seen_seq = log_next_seq;
- }
if (console_seq < log_first_seq) {
/* messages are gone, move to first one */
@@ -2124,6 +2120,10 @@ skip:
*/
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
retry = console_seq != log_next_seq;
+ if (seen_seq != log_next_seq) {
+ wake_klogd = true;
+ seen_seq = log_next_seq;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
if (retry && console_trylock())
--
1.8.0.1.20.g7c65b2e.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
