On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwbo...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:25 AM >> To: Ben Hutchings; Greg KH >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux- >> foundation.org; a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; Deucher, Alexander >> Subject: Re: [ 67/89] drm/radeon: properly track the crtc not_enabled case >> evergreen_mc_stop() >> >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> >> wrote: >> > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> > >> > ------------------ >> > >> > From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> >> > >> > commit 804cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 upstream. >> > >> > The save struct is not initialized previously so explicitly >> > mark the crtcs as not used when they are not in use. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> >> >> Hm. If this is needed in 3.2, presumably it's needed in 3.6 as well. I >> don't see it queued for 3.6.9, and the Cc: tag is there. >> >> Greg, Alex, was this just something that was missed, or am I wrong about >> it needing to go into 3.6? > > The original patches should go into 3.6 kernels as well: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4a15903db02026728d0cf2755c6fabae16b8db6a > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=62444b7462a2b98bc78d68736c03a7c4e66ba7e2 > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=804cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 > > I've been meaning to follow up on it, but I haven't had the time. Do I need > to send explicit patches to stable@vger or can I just ask the above commits > be cherrypicked to 3.6? >
Normally the CC tag works. Not entirely sure why it didn't for the one patch I asked about. The other two commits you've highlighted here are lacking any sort of stable tag, so you'd have to pipe up here about them. I went ahead and tried the cherry-pick myself on top of 3.6.9, in the order you specified above. The 62444b7462a has a trivial conflict coming back. I've attached an mbox with these three patches. If you want to give them a glance over and OK them, that would be great. (Apologies for the attachment. Gmail is going to mess it up otherwise.) I have them building locally at the moment on top of 3.6.9 and don't expect many issues, but I can't personally test the fixes myself. josh
radeon-evergreen-3.6.9-fixes.mbox
Description: Binary data
