On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:01:25PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > First, generally, I don't think 'allows' added to parent should be > automatically propagated to descendents.
that's what I think too and what I tried to do > In devcgroup_update_access: (around line 625) > there is a period of time where cgroup members have > default allow without the parent's exceptions. true, will fix that one and look for more cases > propagate_behavior (line 505): > 1. doesn't follow the same ordering as devcgroup_update_access(), in > particular cleaning exceptions before setting behavior. I see, will update that > 2. When changing a parent from deny to allow, I don't think children > should be updated. I disagree on this one. since there'll be local preferences, it'll try to revalidate them everytime there's a change. so, for example, an exception that might not be possible now, will be possible when its parent changes in a way that allows that. -- Aristeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
