Hi Myungjoo/Chanwoo/Aneesh/Anton,

Could you please review this. This is a follow up patch for "PATCH] extcon : 
callback function to read cable property"
-jtc

> Subject: [PATCH] EXTCON: Get and set cable properties
> 
> Existing EXTCON implementation doesn't give a mechanim to read the cable
> properties and extra states a cable needs to support. There are scenarios
> where a cable can have more than two
> states(CONNECT/DISCONNECT/SUSPEND/RESUME etc) and can have some
> properties associated with cables(mA)
> 
> This patch introduces interface to get and set cable properties from EXTCON
> framework. The cable property can be set either by the extcon cable
> provider or by other subsystems who know the cable properties using eth
> API extcon_cable_set_data()
> 
> When the consumer gets a notification from the extcon, it can use the
> extcon_cable_get_data() to get the cable properties irrespective of who
> provides the cable data.
> 
> This gives a single interface for setting and getting the cable properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jenny TC <jenny...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/extcon.h        |   39
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> index d398821..304f343 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,36 @@ int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev
> *edev,  }  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_unregister_notifier);
> 
> +/**
> + * extcon_cable_set_data() - Set the data structure for a cable
> + * @edev:    the extcon device
> + * @cable_index:     the cable index of the correspondant
> + * @type:    type of the data structure
> + * @data:
> + */
> +void extcon_cable_set_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int cable_index,
> +                        enum extcon_cable_name type,
> +                        union extcon_cable_data data)
> +{
> +     edev->cables[cable_index].type = type;
> +     edev->cables[cable_index].data = data; }
> +
> +/**
> + * extcon_cable_get_data() - Get the data structure for a cable
> + * @edev:    the extcon device
> + * @cable_index:     the cable index of the correspondant
> + * @type:    type of the data structure
> + * @data:    the corresponding data structure (e.g., regulator)
> + */
> +void extcon_cable_get_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int cable_index,
> +                        enum extcon_cable_name *type,
> +                        union extcon_cable_data *data)
> +{
> +     *type = edev->cables[cable_index].type;
> +     *data = edev->cables[cable_index].data; }
> +
>  static struct device_attribute extcon_attrs[] = {
>       __ATTR(state, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, state_show, state_store),
>       __ATTR_RO(name),
> diff --git a/include/linux/extcon.h b/include/linux/extcon.h index
> 2c26c14..4556cc5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/extcon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/extcon.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,19 @@ struct extcon_dev {
>       struct device_attribute *d_attrs_muex;  };
> 
> +/* FIXME: Is this the right place for this structure definition?
> + * Do we need to move it to power_supply.h?
> + */
> +struct extcon_chrgr_cable_props {
> +     unsigned long state;
> +     int mA;
> +};
> +
> +union extcon_cable_data {
> +     struct extcon_chrgr_cable_props chrgr_cbl_props;
> +     /* Please add accordingly*/
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * struct extcon_cable       - An internal data for each cable of extcon 
> device.
>   * @edev     The extcon device
> @@ -143,6 +156,8 @@ struct extcon_dev {
>   * @attr_name        "name" sysfs entry
>   * @attr_state       "state" sysfs entry
>   * @attrs    Array pointing to attr_name and attr_state for attr_g
> + * @type:    The type of @data.
> + * @data:    The data structure representing the status and states of this
> cable.
>   */
>  struct extcon_cable {
>       struct extcon_dev *edev;
> @@ -153,6 +168,11 @@ struct extcon_cable {
>       struct device_attribute attr_state;
> 
>       struct attribute *attrs[3]; /* to be fed to attr_g.attrs */
> +
> +     union extcon_cable_data data;
> +
> +     /* extcon cable type */
> +     enum extcon_cable_name type;
>  };
> 
>  /**
> @@ -183,6 +203,17 @@ extern void extcon_dev_unregister(struct
> extcon_dev *edev);  extern struct extcon_dev
> *extcon_get_extcon_dev(const char *extcon_name);
> 
>  /*
> + * Following APIs are for managing the status and states of each cable.
> + * For example, if a cable is represented as a regulator, then the
> +cable
> + * may have struct regulator as its data.
> + */
> +extern void extcon_cable_set_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int
> cable_index,
> +                     enum extcon_cable_name type,
> +                     union extcon_cable_data data);
> +extern void extcon_cable_get_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int
> cable_index,
> +                     enum extcon_cable_name *type,
> +                     union extcon_cable_data *data);
> +/*
>   * get/set/update_state access the 32b encoded state value, which
> represents
>   * states of all possible cables of the multistate port. For example, if one
>   * calls extcon_set_state(edev, 0x7), it may mean that all the three cables
> @@ -244,6 +275,14 @@ static inline int extcon_dev_register(struct
> extcon_dev *edev,
> 
>  static inline void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev) { }
> 
> +static void extcon_cable_set_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int
> cable_index,
> +                             enum extcon_cable_name type,
> +                             union extcon_cable_data data) { }
> +
> +static void extcon_cable_get_data(struct extcon_dev *edev, int
> cable_index,
> +                             enum extcon_cable_name *type,
> +                             union extcon_cable_data *data) { }
> +
>  static inline u32 extcon_get_state(struct extcon_dev *edev)  {
>       return 0;
> --
> 1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to