3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
commit a7227a0faa117d0bc532aea546ae5ac5f89e8ed7 upstream.
dev_pm_qos_add_request() can return 0, 1, or a negative error code,
therefore the correct error test is "if (error < 0)." Checking just for
non-zero return code leads to erroneous setting of the req->dev pointer
to NULL, which then leads to a repeated call to
dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request() in st1232_ts_irq_handler(). This in turn
leads to an Oops, when the I2C host adapter is unloaded and reloaded again
because of the inconsistent state of its QoS request list.
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovet...@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/power/qos.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(stru
if (ancestor)
error = dev_pm_qos_add_request(ancestor, req, value);
- if (error)
+ if (error < 0)
req->dev = NULL;
return error;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
