On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:33 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
[....]
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!current->mm);
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - rdtp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_dynticks);
> - if (!rdtp->ignore_user_qs && !rdtp->in_user) {
> - rdtp->in_user = true;
> - rcu_eqs_enter(true);
> - }
It seems to me that ignore_user_qs and in_user defined in struct
rcu_dynticks are no longer needed?
If so, then maybe we could remove them, code below:
==========
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index e441b77..b8fae5d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -2719,9 +2719,6 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting != DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE);
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks->dynticks) != 1);
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->in_user);
-#endif
rdp->cpu = cpu;
rdp->rsp = rsp;
rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 4b69291..6f21f2e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -102,10 +102,6 @@ struct rcu_dynticks {
/* idle-period nonlazy_posted snapshot. */
int tick_nohz_enabled_snap; /* Previously seen value from sysfs. */
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
- bool ignore_user_qs; /* Treat userspace as extended QS or not */
- bool in_user; /* Is the CPU in userland from RCU POV? */
-#endif
};
/* RCU's kthread states for tracing. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
