On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On a 2.6.31 system, immediately after SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR, a >>> SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD returns 0. >> >> Hmm, sounds like the right thing to do. > > Right. > > And that's the *OLD* behavior (2.6.31).
Ah, hmm, I read 2.6... as 3.6... :) > So the new behavior is insane and different. Let's fix it. Yeah. > It looks like it is because the new SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD code > does not take the new clear_seq code into account. Hmm? Right, something like that. I'll take a look now ... Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
