Hello Rafael,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
> > - struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs, unsigned int sampling_rate)
> > + struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs,
> > + unsigned int sampling_rate,
> > + int cpu)
> > {
> > int delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(sampling_rate);
> > + struct cpu_dbs_common_info *cdbs_local = dbs_data->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
> > + struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *od_dbs_info;
> > +
> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&cdbs_local->work);
> > +
> > + if (dbs_data->governor == GOV_ONDEMAND) {
> > + od_dbs_info = dbs_data->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
> > + od_dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
> > + }
>
> The patch looks good in general except for the special case above.
>
> Why exactly is it necessary?
Now that you point it out... it's not! It was part of ondemand init and
moved in cpufreq_governor_dbs, I forgot to take it out the way.
Also, I think that cancel_delayed_work_sync can be removed too.
Should I send an updated version as soon as I get an ack for the other
patches in the series or do you want me to wait until 3.8-rc1?
Thanks,
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
