On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > Can we have some closure on this patch please, as it's blocking the > > > > > patch-set? I'm fairly sure the patch is doing the correct thing, as > > > > > seconded by Mark. > > > > > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We > > > > have > > > > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP > > > > I2S-block is > > > > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at > > > > the same time. > > > > Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the > > > > platform_name instead? > > > > There are other drivers which do this already. > > > > I don't think it's an issue to do this. > > > Has anyone had any more bright ideas on how we might handle this? > > > The device is still being handled in platform code and I'm desperate > > to get it out of there. > > Why do we need any ideas? Just implement it already.
How do you mean? I've written the patch, just accept it. ;) -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
