I don't see any point in three flags here. Let's stick to one flag; then it fits in the existing boot_flags field.
Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> >wrote: >>> We probably should add a flag for those, but that is more of a >boot_flag... >> >> kernel_cap_bits: >> RAMDISK_ABOVE_4G = (1<<0) >> KERNEL_ABOVE_4G =(1<<2) >> CMD_LINE_ABOVE 4G = (1<<1) >> .long (RAMDISK_ABOVE_4G | CMD_LINE_ABOVE_4G | >KERNEL_ABOVE_4G) > >more complete version: > >kernel_cap_bits: >RAMDISK_ABOVE_4G = (1<<0) >KERNEL_ABOVE_4G =(1<<1) >BOOT_PARAMS_ABOVE_4G=(1<<2) >CMD_LINE_ABOVE 4G = (1<<3) > .long (RAMDISK_ABOVE_4G | BOOT_PARAMS_ABOVE_4G | >CMD_LINE_ABOVE_4G | KERNEL_ABOVE_4G) -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/