We do "selector += info->volt.v_offset" in da9055_regulator_set_voltage_bits()
to take care of voltage range that does not start with 0 offset.
Thus in da9055_regulator_get_voltage_sel() we should do corresponding
"sel -= volt.v_offset" before returning selector.
Otherwise, we pass wrong selector for list_voltage callback.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
---
drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
index 79c5665..dbcb43d 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
@@ -232,10 +232,9 @@ static int da9055_regulator_get_voltage_sel(struct
regulator_dev *rdev)
return ret;
sel = (ret & volt.v_mask);
- if (sel <= volt.v_offset)
- return 0;
- else
- return sel;
+ sel -= volt.v_offset;
+
+ return sel;
}
static int da9055_regulator_set_voltage_bits(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
