On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 19:14 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 10:08 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 18:34 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: > > > Move ipack header files to include/linux/ directory where they belong to. > > > > Why do these belong in include/linux? > > They are used for other drivers that could be in other directories.
But are not currently. > > What's wrong with path relative includes? > > There is nothing wrong with relative includes. It's just to do the > things as other subsystems do: keeping the bus' header file in > include/linux directory. > > Is this approach wrong for this case? There's enough clutter in include/linux, so until these includes are used by other directory drivers, I think so, yes. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
