On 11/16/2012 12:53 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> ramdisk could be loaded high now for 64bit.
>
> So need to print more digits for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.flem...@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index c2eb535..0e13c6e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void __init relocate_initrd(void)
> memblock_reserve(ramdisk_here, area_size);
> initrd_start = ramdisk_here + PAGE_OFFSET;
> initrd_end = initrd_start + ramdisk_size;
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Allocated new RAMDISK: [mem %#010llx-%#010llx]\n",
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Allocated new RAMDISK: [mem %#018llx-%#018llx]\n",
> ramdisk_here, ramdisk_here + ramdisk_size - 1);
NAK, this is expected to match the resource print format (%pR), which
prints 10 digits by default and then expands. Furthermore, printing
*18* digits is downright silly since we still don't have 72-bit addressing.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
