Shan Wei said, at 2012/11/13 9:51:
> From: Shan Wei <davids...@tencent.com>
> 
> flush_tasklet is a struct, not a pointer in percpu var.
> so use this_cpu_ptr to get the member pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davids...@tencent.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com>

David Miller,  would you like to pick it up to your net-next tree?

> ---
> no changes vs v3.
> ---
>  net/core/flow.c |    4 +---
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/flow.c b/net/core/flow.c
> index e318c7e..b0901ee 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow.c
> @@ -327,11 +327,9 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>  static void flow_cache_flush_per_cpu(void *data)
>  {
>       struct flow_flush_info *info = data;
> -     int cpu;
>       struct tasklet_struct *tasklet;
>  
> -     cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -     tasklet = &per_cpu_ptr(info->cache->percpu, cpu)->flush_tasklet;
> +     tasklet = this_cpu_ptr(&info->cache->percpu->flush_tasklet);
>       tasklet->data = (unsigned long)info;
>       tasklet_schedule(tasklet);
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to