Hi Andrew, On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:56:35 -0800 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:47:26 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while > > > you're away. That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will > > > make it easier for others to integrate and test the four(!) > > > different autoschednumacore implementations on top of > > > linux-next. > > > > > > Pretty please? > > > > The next integration should have this solved: I have removed the > > old sched/numa bits, replaced by the latest rebased/reworked > > numa/core bits. > > That solves one problem, but I still need to route around the numa > stuff when preparing the 3.8-rc1 merge. Again!
I am not sure what is actually involved here, but would it help if I made you a new akpm-base with the old tip tree replaced by the new one that Ingo just pushed out? Or are there still problematic things in the tip tree? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpAijL7Gb2xX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
