Hi Paul > I know of people using TINY_RCU, TREE_RCU, and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but I > have not heard of anyone using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU for whom TREE_PREEMPT_RCU > was not a viable option (in contrast, the people running Linux on > tiny-memmory systems typically use TINY_RCU). Of course, if no one > really needs it, the proper thing to do is to remove it. > > So, if you need TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, please let me know. Otherwise, I will > remove it, probably in the 3.9 timeframe. I am using TINY_PREEMPT_RCU on the i.mx35 platform. I am currently on 3.4-rt since the 3.6 compile failed due to for my config? Some strange device tree stuff which i haven't had the time to figure out why.
Best regards Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
