On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:35:49AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> The function is buried pretty deep in the cpufreq_stat code. It didn't
> seem appropriate to make it a function pointer as part of struct
> cpufreq_driver.
Right, what's cpufreq-speak for
if (Calxeda)
shift by 10
?
Better yet, add a flag or a bitfield called "minimize_jitter" or similar
and set it only on your hardware...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
