Hi Grant, On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > <pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote: >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: >>> Maybe some extra version match table can just be passed during the board >>> machine_init >>> >>> of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL, >>> panda_version_match_table); >>> >> >> Would we need explicit of_platform_populate calls if we have node >> modification notifiers? >> In that case the notifier would pick it up automatically, and can do the per >> version matching internally. > > There still needs to be something to register "everything below this > node is interesting" which is exactly what of_platform_populate() does > now. I see the notifiers being used by the of_platform_populate > backend to know when nodes have been created (or destroyed). > > g. I see. So of_platform_populate could just register the notifier and not do the tree walk itself. Perhaps the name is a bit misleading then? Regards -- Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
