Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:58:19PM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If it is generic ACPI code, than it can depend only on ACPI.
>>>>> If it is ACPI code that contains X86 specific info, than it needs
>>>>> to depend on X86 too.
>>>> 
>>>> No x86 specific so let's depend on ACPI.
>>> 
>>> Huh? This feature is x86 specific isn't it? I mean it is in the ACPI
>>> spec, but only x86 does it right?
>> 
>> OK, updated w/ ACPI & X86 dependency, and per other comments.
> 
> Ok. Could you send all the patchset in one go. I am bit lost of which
> one to review as none of them seem to have the version information
> [vX: Did this yyy]

Not quite clear your meaning, do you mean not reply old email and start a new 
thread with title like
[PATCH vX 1/2]: xen/acpi: ACPI PAD driver
[PATCH vX 2/2]: ...
?

> 
> right above your name or in the title:
> [PATCH vX 1/2]: yyyy
> 
> anyhow, some comments below.
> 

OK.

Thanks,
Jinsong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to