Greetings! Shouldn't a SIGSEGV fill in th si_addr member of the
siginfo_t structure passed to a signal handler? Here is what I see
(on several archs):
=============================================================================
q.c
=============================================================================
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
void
nh(int s,siginfo_t *si,void *sc) {
printf("%p\n",si->si_addr);
exit(0);
}
int
main() {
struct sigaction sa;
char c[3];
memset(&sa,0,sizeof(sa));
sa.sa_sigaction=nh;
sa.sa_flags=SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO;
sigaction(SIGSEGV,&sa,0);
c[4096]=0;
/* raise(SIGSEGV); */
return 0;
}
=============================================================================
camm@kullervo:~$ cc -g q.c -o q
cc -g q.c -o q
camm@kullervo:~$ ./q
./q
(nil)
=============================================================================
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
