On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 01:15 -0500, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > > Cc: Huang Ying <ying.hu...@intel.com> > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c > > > index 02d107b..12d3d52 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c > > > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ pci_config_pm_runtime_put(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > > struct device *parent = dev->parent; > > > > > > - pm_runtime_put(dev); > > > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > > > if (parent) > > > pm_runtime_put_sync(parent); > > > } > > > > I think you do not need that. You can implement timeout > > in .runtime_idle callback of the driver. > > If I understand what you are suggesting, I should setup some kinda of timer > callback to later call suspend, but that seems pointless for me if we have > the autosuspend mechanism in place. > > Won't I end up racing my timer against other pm stuff? I'm not really runtime > pm expert so maybe I'm just missing something.
You can call pm_runtime_autosuspend or pm_runtime_schedule_suspend in .runtime_idle callback of the driver. Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
