Hello,

We have observed entropy quickly depleting under normal I/O between 2.6.30 to 
upstream, for instance:

$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail 
3428
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail 
2911
$cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail 
2620

It has been occurred with fs/binfmt_elf.c: 
create_elf_tables()->get_random_bytes()
was introduced began at 2.6.30.
/*
 * Generate 16 random bytes for userspace PRNG seeding.
 */
get_random_bytes(k_rand_bytes, sizeof(k_rand_bytes));

This proposal patch is trying to introduce a wrapper of get_random_int() which 
has lower overhead
than calling get_random_bytes() directly.

Entropy increased with this patch applied:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2731
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2802
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
2878


v3->v2:
-------
Remove redundant bits mask and shift upon the random variable according to 
Kees's review.

v2->v1:
-------
Fix random copy to check up buffer length that are not 4-byte multiples 
according to Andreas's comments.

v2 can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg59418.html
v1 can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg59128.html

Many thanks to Andreas, Andrew as well as Kees for reviewing the patch of past.

-Jeff


Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff....@oracle.com>
Cc: John Sobecki <john.sobe...@oracle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <aedil...@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.mor...@oracle.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drep...@redhat.com>

---
 fs/binfmt_elf.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index fbd9f60..9c36e50 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct 
pt_regs *regs);
 static int load_elf_library(struct file *);
 static unsigned long elf_map(struct file *, unsigned long, struct elf_phdr *,
                                int, int, unsigned long);
+static void randomize_stack_user(unsigned char *buf, size_t nbytes);
 
 /*
  * If we don't support core dumping, then supply a NULL so we
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ create_elf_tables(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct elfhdr 
*exec,
        /*
         * Generate 16 random bytes for userspace PRNG seeding.
         */
-       get_random_bytes(k_rand_bytes, sizeof(k_rand_bytes));
+       randomize_stack_user(k_rand_bytes, sizeof(k_rand_bytes));
        u_rand_bytes = (elf_addr_t __user *)
                       STACK_ALLOC(p, sizeof(k_rand_bytes));
        if (__copy_to_user(u_rand_bytes, k_rand_bytes, sizeof(k_rand_bytes)))
@@ -558,6 +559,27 @@ static unsigned long randomize_stack_top(unsigned long 
stack_top)
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * A wrapper of get_random_int() to generate random bytes which has lower
+ * overhead than calling get_random_bytes() directly.
+ * create_elf_tables() call this function to generate 16 random bytes for
+ * userspace PRNG seeding.
+ */
+static void randomize_stack_user(unsigned char *buf, size_t nbytes)
+{
+       unsigned char *p = buf;
+
+       while (nbytes) {
+               unsigned int random_variable;
+               size_t chunk = min(nbytes, sizeof(unsigned int));
+
+               random_variable = get_random_int();
+               memcpy(p, &random_variable, chunk);
+               p += chunk;
+               nbytes -= chunk;
+       }
+}
+
 static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
        struct file *interpreter = NULL; /* to shut gcc up */
-- 
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to