On Monday 05 November 2012, Julia Lawall wrote:
> OK, I could try proposing that, and if someone doesn't think it is the
> right thing to do, they can ignore the patch.
>
> Concretely, KERN_WARNING should be added in the printk called from WARN,
> and all KERN information should be removed from the calls?
I think that would be the right solution, yes. Unfortunately, I don't
know how to easily do this since we are already passing down a format
string into vprintk here. Maybe just add the KERN_WARNING at the point
where __WARN_printf gets called.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
