On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou <pa...@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote: > Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime > resolution mechanism is approved, > then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the > functionality assumed by generic > DT core. > > The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would > be acceptable from > the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what > they think about it.
This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
