On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> i found, that linux is missing a static low-priority scheduling class
> (or did i miss something? in this case feel free to stomp me into the
> ground :). it would be ideal for typical number-crunchers running in
> the background like the different distributed.net-like clients.
The problem with these things it that sometimes such a task may
hold a lock, which can prevent higher-priority tasks from running.
A solution would be to make sure that these tasks get at least one
time slice every 3 seconds or so, so they can release any locks
they might be holding and the system as a whole won't livelock.
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
