On Wed, Mar 07 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > SCSI certainly lets us do both of these operations independently. IDE > has the sync/flush command afaik, but I'm not sure whether the IDE > tagged command stuff has the equivalent of SCSI's ordered tag bits. > Andre? IDE has no concept of ordered tags... -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Douglas Gilbert
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Linus Torvalds
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Jonathan Morton
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's dean gaudet
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's dean gaudet
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fs... Jonathan Morton
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Andre Hedrick
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Alan Cox
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Linus Torvalds
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fs... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: scsi vs ide performance o... Jens Axboe
- Re: scsi vs ide performance o... Andre Hedrick
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Mike Black
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Jeremy Hansen
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fs... Jonathan Morton
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fs... Jeremy Hansen
- Re: scsi vs ide performance o... Linus Torvalds
- Re: scsi vs ide performance o... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's David Balazic
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Gregory Maxwell
- Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's Jonathan Morton