Zheng Li <zheng.x...@oracle.com> wrote:
>This is a fix for a bug in bond_alb.c
>Rate of reproduced:100%
>Scenario: set Dom0 to bond 6 mode, Domu communicate with Dom0 through vif which
>is in bridge mode. The Dom0's bridge of xenbr0 contains vif and bond0, bond0
>contains eth0 and eth1. You can just need to ping a host which is in same LAN
>on
>Domu, some of packets will be lost intermittently.
>Analyse: When Dom0 set bond mode to 6, the bond alb will change MAC of every
>arp
>reply in rlb_arp_xmit function to affect receive packets, it is ok for normal
>NIC, but it's wrong to Domu, when Domu send arp reply through vif of Dom0, bond
>of alb replace Domu's MAC in arp reply with NIC's MAC address, that will cause
>remote host send packets to Domu using real NIC's MAC instead of Domu's MAC.
>Domu
>can't receive the packets whose dst MAC is not Domu's MAC.
If I understand correctly, the issue really isn't about Dom0 /
Domu specifically, but rather that ARP traffic passing through a bridge
and out via the bond (when the bond is a port of the bridge) should not
have its source MAC address adjusted by the receive load balance code in
rlb_arp_xmit.
Is my understanding correct?
If so, then the patch in principle seems reasonable (although it
could be coded without the sentinel; more on that in a minute), but the
subject and description aren't really an accurate description of the
root problem (just one manifestation of it). A better subject might be
something like "rlb mode should not alter ARP replies originating via
bridge."
>Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fu...@us.ibm.com>
>Cc: Andy Gospodarek <a...@greyhouse.net>
>Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
>Signed-off-by: Zheng Li <zheng.x...@oracle.com>
>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>index e15cc11..d6b134a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>@@ -700,7 +700,18 @@ static struct slave *rlb_arp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>struct bonding *bond)
> */
> tx_slave = rlb_choose_channel(skb, bond);
> if (tx_slave) {
>- memcpy(arp->mac_src,tx_slave->dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
>+ struct slave *tmp_slave = NULL;
>+ int i = 0, found_mac = 0;
>+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp_slave, i) {
>+ if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(arp->mac_src,
>+ tmp_slave->dev->dev_addr)) {
>+ found_mac = 1;
>+ break;
>+ }
>+ }
>+ if (found_mac)
>+ memcpy(arp->mac_src, tx_slave->dev->dev_addr,
>+ ETH_ALEN);
I think this could be coded as:
bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp_slave, i) {
if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(arp->mac_src,
tmp_slave->dev->dev_addr)) {
memcpy(arp->mac_src,
tx_slave->dev->dev_addr,
ETH_ALEN);
break;
}
}
or even create a "bond_slave_has_mac" helper, since this loop is
something done several times in the code, e.g.,
struct slave *bond_slave_has_mac(struct bonding *bond, const u8 *mac)
{
int i = 0;
struct slave *tmp;
bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp, i)
if (ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac, tmp->dev->dev_addr))
return tmp;
return NULL;
}
then your code would be
if (tx_slave) {
struct slave *tmp;
/* Only modify ARP's MAC if it originates locally;
* don't change ARPs arriving via a bridge.
*/
tmp = bond_slave_has_mac(bond, arp->mac_src);
if (tmp)
memcpy(arp->mac_src, tx_slave->dev->dev_addr,
ETH_ALEN);
... and so on. I haven't tested any of the above, I'm just
scribbling it out into email, but it seems reasonable.
> }
> pr_debug("Server sent ARP Reply packet\n");
> } else if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REQUEST)) {
>--
>1.7.6.5
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fu...@us.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
