On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 17:25 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync()
That one is fine too, as this is the purpose of cpu_relax(). Not only to relax the cpu, but also to tell gcc that the loop needs to be reread. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
