On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnier...@samsung.com> wrote:
> * Add device tree (DT) property ("pl330,dma-memcpy") for DMA_MEMCPY
> capability and instead of setting this capability unconditionally
> in pl330_probe() do it only when property is present.
>
Perhaps we should pass the array of peripheral interfaces via DT, the
lack of which could imply MEMCPY capability ? (while it works, I doubt
if pl330 is supposed to have SLAVE and MEMCPY capabilities in any
instance)
That would also be a step towards discarding "struct dma_pl330_platdata".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
