On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Josh, > > > Michal- > > > > Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your > > feedback. I've intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until > > we figure out the appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to > > just apply 1-3) > > I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is > no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process > but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't > apply it. Can someone else check this?
It turns out that with the change to patch 5 to map the uart to a known working address (instead of VMALLOC_END - 0x1000), patch 4 isn't needed, and as such can be dropped. (I didn't realize this until this morning until I had saw you had applied 1-3,5 to your tree, but not 4). So, for what it's worth, you've applied all of the relevant patches for this patchset. Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
