* Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> writes:
>
> > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its
> > own; it wants to be compared to either a total of interleave
> > allocations or to a miss count, remove it.
> >
> > Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years
> > without these statistics I figure we can continue that way.
> >
> > Also NUMA_HIT fully includes NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT so users
> > might switch to using that.
> >
> > This cleans up some of the weird MPOL_INTERLEAVE allocation
> > exceptions.
>
> NACK, as already posted several times.
>
> This breaks the numactl test suite, which is the only way
> currently to test interleaving.
This patch is not essential to the NUMA series so I've zapped it
from the patch queue and fixed up the roll-on effects.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
