On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:26:14AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > The way this function was written is confusing and already caused problems. > Rewriting it to be easier to understand and maintain. > > Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org> > Cc: Li Zefan <lize...@huawei.com> > Cc: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <a...@redhat.com> > > --- > fs/xattr.c | 124 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) > > Index: github/fs/xattr.c > =================================================================== > --- github.orig/fs/xattr.c 2012-10-23 16:02:41.155857391 -0400 > +++ github/fs/xattr.c 2012-10-25 11:17:15.118197552 -0400 > @@ -842,55 +842,46 @@ > return ret; > } >
Looks good to me Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiol...@redhat.com> -- --Carlos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
