On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 06:33:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:07:41AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > > > > > ... which, analogous to DEVICE_INT_ATTR provides functionality to > > > set/clear bools. Its purpose is to be used where values need to be used > > > as booleans in configuration context. > > > > > > Next patch uses this. > > > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > > > Do you want me to take this through my tree now? If not, I have no > > objection to it being part of this larger series and go to Linus through > > whatever tree takes it. > > Well, in my case it would go through the RAS tree.
Then I'd recommend it going in that way. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
