Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org): > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Serge Hallyn > <serge.hal...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org): > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Serge Hallyn > >> <serge.hal...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> > Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org): > >> >> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is > >> >> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel > >> >> summit, remove it. > >> >> > >> >> CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com> > >> >> CC: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@canonical.com> > >> >> CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> >> CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > >> >> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > >> >> --- > >> >> init/Kconfig | 23 ++++++++++------------- > >> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig > >> >> index 2bf7b83..4b65c1c 100644 > >> >> --- a/init/Kconfig > >> >> +++ b/init/Kconfig > >> >> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ config SYSVIPC_SYSCTL > >> >> > >> >> config POSIX_MQUEUE > >> >> bool "POSIX Message Queues" > >> >> - depends on NET && EXPERIMENTAL > >> >> + depends on NET > >> >> ---help--- > >> >> POSIX variant of message queues is a part of IPC. In POSIX > >> >> message > >> >> queues every message has a priority which decides about > >> >> succession > >> >> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ config BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 > >> >> at <http://www.gnu.org/software/acct/>. > >> >> > >> >> config TASKSTATS > >> >> - bool "Export task/process statistics through netlink > >> >> (EXPERIMENTAL)" > >> >> + bool "Export task/process statistics through netlink" > >> > > >> > In these cases, should we keep the '(EXPERIMENTAL)' text since it is just > >> > a hint to anyone running make menuconfig? I think removing the 'depends > >> > on > >> > EXPERIMENTAL's is fine, but cases we should leave it (or replace it) as > >> > a textual hint, except in cases where we're sure that is no longer the > >> > case. > >> > >> I covered this in the 000 intro email > >> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/580): > > > > intro email is an appreciated courtesy, but should not take the place of > > info in the individual patch changelogs, especially as the intro emails > > won't go into git history. > > > >> Some patches remove "(EXPERIMENTAL)" from Kconfig titles when there was > >> no "depends on EXPERIMENTAL". I've removed the cases of these where I > > > > Hm, I was under the impression that taskstats are not quite trusted yet, > > but I could be way out of date with that. > > I'm happy to leave the taskstats title alone. Shall I?
Heh, no, sounds like I'm just way out of date. Thanks Kees! Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> thanks, -serge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
